Disputes

History

Disputes are handled as evidence-bearing workflows with preserved submissions, responses, review actions and resolutions.

Evidence-awareAuthority-awareLifecycle-aware

Purpose

One function. Explicit trust boundaries.

Disputes are handled as evidence-bearing workflows with preserved submissions, responses, review actions and resolutions.

Every material state transition should remain attributable to an authenticated actor, an authority context, a timestamp and the evidence required to reconstruct what happened.

Operational flow

History lifecycle.

Open admissible dispute

Preserve contested evidence

Receive response

Independent / authorized review

Publish resolution state

Object model

Minimum verification context.

The exact schema can vary by object class and policy version, but the verification layer should be able to resolve these core dimensions.

Dispute ID
Contested object
Claimant / authority
Grounds
Evidence
Responses
Review state
Resolution

Operational state

Designed for progressive activation.

InterfacePrepared

BackendIntegration required

Audit trailDesigned

Status modelDefined

Production status must always be sourced from the deployed service and published through System Status; this static package does not claim backend activation.

Related PAR domains